Tingkat Kriminalitas di Kota Banjarmasin dengan Pendekatan Ekonomi
Keywords:
Income Distribution Inequality (Gini Ratio), Poverty, Job Opportunity, Crime RatesAbstract
This study examines the influence of (1) the effect of income distribution inequality (Gini ratio), poverty, and job opportunity that simultaneously in crime rates (2) which one of the factors that more dominant effect in crime rates. The object of this study is Banjarmasin City. This research used secondary data in the form of time series for 12 years, started from 2007 to 2018. Data processed used multiple linear regression with software Eviews 9.
This study proved that are partially variables income distribution inequality (Gini ratio) was positive and significant. At the same time, variable poverty and variable job opportunity are both positive and not significant in crime rates in Banjarmasin City. Whereas simultaneously, three independent variables were not significant in crime rates in Banjarmasin City. Then, variable income distribution inequality (Gini ratio)is the dominant effect in crime rates in Banjarmasin City.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. https://kalsel.bps.go.id. Kalimantan Selatan: BPS. Diakses pada tanggal 18 Juni 2020.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarmasin. https://banjarmasinkota.bps.go.id. Banjarmasin: BPS. Diakses pada tanggal 18 Juni 2020.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76(2). https://www.nber.org/chapters/c3625.pdf (Diakses 18 Juni 2020).
Gujarati, D. (2003). Ekonometri Dasar. Terjemahan: Sumarno Zain. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Hamzah, A. (1986). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana dan Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hardianto, F. N. (2009). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kriminalitas di Indonesia dari Pendekatan Ekonomi. Bina Ekonomi, 13(2), 28-41. http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/BinaEkonomi/article/view/713 (Diakses 26 Agustus 2019).
Herpandi, W. D. (2017). Pengaruh Ketimpangan Ekonomi terhadap Tingkat Kriminalitas di Kota Medan. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Ichsan, P. R. (2015). Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi terhadap Tingkat Kriminalitas di Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
Jannah. (2017). Pengaruh Variabel Pengangguran, Kemiskinan, dan Kepadatan Penduduk terhadap Kriminalitas Properti di Kota Banjarmasin. Banjarmasin: Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.
Kartono, K. (2015). Patologi Sosial 1. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kindangen, P., & Tumiwa, J. (2015). Kewirausahaan dan Kesempatan Kerja di Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum, 2(3), 85-101. https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/108331/kewirausahaan-dan-kesempatan-kerja-di-kabupaten-minahasa-tenggara (Diakses 3 Juni 2020).
Merton, R. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672-682. http://www.csun.edu/~snk1966/Robert%20K%20Merton%20-%20Social%20Structure%20and%20Anomie%20Original%201938%20Version.pdf (Diakses 21 Oktober 2019).
Owusu, G. (2016). Introduction: Urban Crime and Poverty Nexus. Ghana Journal of Geography, 8(1), 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306290935_Introduction_Crime_and_poverty_nexus (Diakses 21 Oktober 2019).
Rosyidi, S. (2017). Pengantar Teori Ekonomi: Pendekatan kepada Teori Ekonomi Mikro dan Makro. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sulistyanta., & Hehanusa, M. (2016). Kriminologi dalam Teori dan Solusi Penanganan Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Absolute Media.
Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Zaidan, M. (2016). Kebijakan Kriminal. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika.
