Analisis Prioritas Pengembangan Kawasan Wisata Alam Goa di Kabupaten Tapin
Keywords:
Tourism, Tourism Place, Nature Tourism, Batu Hapu Cave, Beramban Cave, AHP Method.Abstract
This research is aimed (1) to know about what is the most dominant criteria for
determining the criteria of development priority cave nature tourism area in tapin regency (2) to know about the most dominant alternative and then the alternative will become focus for development priority of cave nature tourism area in tapin regency.
The respondent in this research consist by 7 respondents who recognized expert for the
effort of development and determining the priority tourism development area in tapin regency and directly could use as respondents for data processing. The analysis method, using AHP
(Analytical Hierarchy Process) method.
The result of this research has showed among acces, amenities, and atraction criteria. The most dominant criteria for determined as criteria of priority for supporting the priority
development of cave nature tourism area in Tapin Regency is atraction with the preference value 54%, amenities with the preference value 30%, and acces with the preference value 16%. Among
two alternatives that is Batu Hapu Cave and Beramban Cave, the highest preference value is Beramban Cave with 69% and the second is Batu Hapu Cave with 31%. It means in the development priority of cave nature tourism area in Tapin Regency more prioritize the development Beramban Cave area.
References
A.J, M. (2010). Kepariwisataan & Perjalanan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Agung, I Gusti Ngurah. (2011). Manajemen Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi. Jakarta: PT
Raja Grafindo Persada.
Dr. I Gusti Bagus Rai Utama, M. A. (2016). Pengantar Industri Pariwisata : Tantangan &
Peluang Bisnis Kreatif. Yogyakarta: CV BUDI UTAMA.
Firdaus, I. H., Abdillah, G., & Renaldi, F. (2016). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan
Karyawan Terbaik. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi 2016
(SENTIKA 2016), 2016(Sentika), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13996
Firdaus, M., Harmini, & M.A, F. (2011). Aplikasi Metode Kuantitatif untuk Manajemen dan
Bisnis. Bogor: PT Penerbit IPB Press.
Indonesia, N. G. (2016). Arief Yahya : 3A Jadi Kunci Pengembangan Destinasi Wisata.
Retrieved February 18, 2019, from http://nationalgeographic.grid.id/read/13305995/arief
yahya-3a-jadi-kunci-pengembangan-destinasi-wisata?page=all
Judisseno, R. K. (2017). Aktivitas dan Kompleksitas Kepariwisataan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia
Pustaka Utama.
Khusnul Khotimah Wilopo, L. H. (2017). Strategi Pengembangan Destinasi Pariwisata Budaya,
Muhyiddin, N. T., Tarmizi, M. I., & Yulianita, A. (2017). Metode Penelitian Ekonomi & Sosial.
Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Nazir, M. (1983). Metode Penelitian. Bogor.
Samming, A. M. (2001). Cakrawala Pariwisata. Jakarta: PT Penerbitan dan Percetakan BALAI
PUSTAKA.
Santi, Dwi Klaudia Pebriana. (2018). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pilihan Kunjungan
Pariwisata Pasar Terapung di Kota Banjarmasin. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis.
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.
Satty, T. L. (2008). Decission Making With The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1(1).
Simanjuntak, B. A., Tanjung, F., & Nasution, R. (2017). Sejarah Pariwisata : Menuju
Perkembangan Pariwisata Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
