Apakah Insentif Fiskal Berbasis Kinerja Mendorong Dinamika Pertumbuhan Regional? Bukti Spasial dari Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia

Authors

  • Sastori Aryanto Program Studi Magister Ekonomi, Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Wiwin Zakiah Program Studi Magister Ekonomi, Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Benius Benius Program Studi Magister Ekonomi, Universitas Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20527/jiep.v9i1.2977

Keywords:

Regional Incentive Fund, Partial Spillover, Economic Growth, Growth Dynamics, Spatial Durbin Model

Abstract

Regional economic disparities remain a persistent challenge in Indonesia's decentralized fiscal system, particularly in resource-rich provinces like Central Kalimantan. This study analyzes the direct influence and spatial spillover effects of Regional Incentive Funds (DID) on regional economic growth and growth dynamics among districts/cities in Central Kalimantan during the 2020–2024 period. Using balanced panel data and the Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) approach, this analysis accommodates spatial dependency through a spatial weighting matrix based on regional proximity. The results indicate significant spatial autocorrelation in regional economic growth and fiscal allocation, as indicated by Moran's I values ​​of 0.214 for economic growth and 0.301 for DID allocation. Empirical findings indicate that DID has a positive and significant direct influence on regional economic growth (0.082; p<0.05), and generates positive spillover effects to neighboring regions (0.054; p<0.05). Furthermore, the growth dynamics model confirms the existence of conditional β growth dynamics, with the initial income coefficient negative and significant (-0.143; p<0.05), indicating that poorer regions tend to grow faster than wealthier regions. This finding indicates that DID functions not only as a governance incentive mechanism but also as a strategic fiscal instrument that promotes spillover-based development and regional growth dynamics. Therefore, policymakers need to integrate spatial aspects into the design of fiscal transfers and strengthen interregional connectivity, infrastructure, and human capital investment to achieve more inclusive regional growth.

References

Cao, Y., Jiang, P., Gong, Z., Yin, K., & Wang, Y. (2024). The spatial spillover effects of clean energy consumption and production on sustainable economic development in China. Heliyon , 10 (8).

Chen, Y., Lv, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The impact of high-speed railway construction on regional economic development in Hubei Province. Management Systems Engineering , 3 (1), 3.

Fanghu, L., Yinnan, H., & Biao, W. (2024). Analysis of logistics capacity, influencing factors and spatial spillover effects in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Plos one , 19 (5), e0303200.

Hou, J., Shi, J., Chen, L., Zhang, Z., & Kuang, E. (2024). Exploring the spatial spillover effects of Yangtze River Delta ports on urban economic growth. Plos one , 19 (8), e0307770.

Jayadevan, C. M., Hoang, N., & Yarram, S. (2025). Spillover effects of globalization using alternative spatial approaches. Applied Economics , 57 (34), 5128-5147.

Li, H., Liu, J., & Wang, H. (2024). Impact of green technology innovation on the quality of regional economic development. International Review of Economics & Finance , 93 , 463-476.

Lin, X., & Baskaran, A. (2025). Regional economic growth, digital economy and tax competition in China: mechanisms and spatial assessment. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy , 30 (3), 886-912.

Liu, Z., Yang, Y., Kim, Y.R., & Liu, A. (2025). Digital economy and regional tourism development: the mediating role of information search from a spatial spillover perspective. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research , 49 (6), 1035-1050.

Miao, Y., Bukhari, AAA, Bukhari, WAA, Ahmad, S., & Hayat, N. (2025). Why do fossil fuels stifle green economic growth? An environmental management perspective in assessing the spatial spillover impact of energy consumption in South Asia. Journal of Environmental Management , 373 , 123471.

Otieno, B. A. (2024). Public debt, investment and economic growth dynamics: Do geographical proximity and spatial spillover effects matter?. Regional Science Policy & Practice , 16 (6), 100059.

Qu, H., You, C., Feng, C. C., & Guo, L. (2024). The spatial spillover effects of ecosystem services: A case study in the Yangtze River economic belt in China. Ecological Indicators , 168 , 112741.

Shang, Y., Lee, H., & Ma, J. (2025). A Study on the Spatial Effects of the Digital Economy on Regional Economic Growth in China. Sustainability , 17 (5), 2259.

Shao, J., Zhang, L., & Cai, C. (2024). Dynamic evolution and spatial spillover effect of agricultural green development on eight economic regions in China. Heliyon , 10 (12).

Sun, A., He, Q., Xiao, C., Hua, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). The spatial spillover effects of regional integration on carbon emissions. International Review of Economics & Finance , 95 , 103447.

Sun, X., Hewings, G. J., & Chen, F. (2024). Intensity of economic relationships: a spatial econometric analysis of regional economic growth in China. The Annals of Regional Science , 73 (1), 165-204.

Varghese, A. M., & Pradhan, R. P. (2025). Transportation infrastructure and economic growth: Does there exist causality and spillover? A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Transportation Research Procedia , 82 , 2618-2632.

Vaz, E. (2024). Spatial spillovers and knowledge structures. In Regional knowledge economies: Exploring the intersection of technology, geography, and innovation in the digital era (pp. 7-21). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Xu, J. (2024). Spatial spillover and threshold effects of digital rural development on agricultural circular economic growth. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems , 8 , 1337637.

Xu, Y., Liao, X., He, R., & Liu, S. (2024). Impact of environmental regulation intensity on the efficiency of sustainable economic growth in the European Union. Journal of cleaner production , 434 , 140047.

Yang, Z., Zhan, J., Wang, C., Liu, W., Wang, H., & Bai, C. (2024). Spatial spillover effects of conversion of new and old driving forces on high-quality development: Evidence from 283 cities in China. Sustainable Cities and Society , 108 , 105487.

Yin, F., Qian, Y., Zeng, J., & Wei, X. (2024). The spatial spillover effects of transportation infrastructure on regional economic growth—an empirical study at the provincial level in China. Sustainability , 16 (19), 8689.

Zhang, Z., Hua, C., Jiang, M. S., & Miao, J. (2024). The spatial spillover effect of financial growth on high-quality development: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 11 (1), 1-17.

Zheng, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Yin, P. (2025). The impact of China's regional economic integration strategy on the circular economy: Policy effects and spatial spillovers. Journal of Environmental Management , 373 , 123669.

Zhou, M., & Guo, F. (2024). Mechanism and spatial spillover effect of digital economy on common prosperity in the Yellow River Basin of China. Scientific Reports , 14 (1), 23086.

Zou, S., Liao, Z., & Fan, X. (2024). The impact of the digital economy on urban total factor productivity: mechanisms and spatial spillover effects. Scientific Reports , 14 (1), 396.

Downloads

Published

26-05-2026

How to Cite

Aryanto, S., Zakiah, W., & Benius, B. (2026). Apakah Insentif Fiskal Berbasis Kinerja Mendorong Dinamika Pertumbuhan Regional? Bukti Spasial dari Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia. JIEP: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 9(1), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.20527/jiep.v9i1.2977

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)